The Outsiders Essays (2376 words) - Films, The Outsiders, Greaser

The Outsiders The Outsiders Introduction In this book analysis, about the book The Outsiders by S. E. Hinton I will discuss character and plot development, as well as the setting, the author's style and my opinions about the book. In this part of the analysis I will give some information about the subjects of the book, and about the author. The author wrote the story when she was just 16 years old, in the 1950s. The book was successful, and it was sold, and still being sold, in many copies as a young adults novel. There was a movie made about it, and today there are still many schools that use this book in junior high and high schools for English classes. There were plays made about the book too. The Outsiders is about a gang. They live in a city in Oklahoma. Ponyboy Curtis, a 14 year old greaser, tells the story. Other characters include Sodapop and Darry, Ponyboy's brothers, Johnny, Dallas, and Two-Bit, that were also gang members and Ponyboy's friends. This story deals with two forms of social classes: the socs, the rich kids, and the greasers, the poor kids. The socs go around looking for trouble and greasers to beat up, and then the greasers are blamed for it, because they are poor and cannot affect the authorities. I hope you would enjoy and learn something about the book from reading this analysis. Plot Development The plot development in the book, The Outsiders by S.E. Hinton, was easy to follow. In this part of the book analysis I will give some more details about the plot development. There were no hooks or hurdles in the beginning of the book, the first sentence starts right away with the plot?without any forewords. This is the beginning of the first sentence: When I stepped out into the bright sunlight from the darkness of the movie house... (page 9). As you can see, it goes straight to the point without any prologues or any kind of introduction. The plot development in the middle of the story was sensible and easy to understand. It was clear and simple, and the events have occurred in a reasonable order. The ending of the story was a bit expected. I anticipated the death of Johnny because a broken neck usually means death. The death of Dally was not as predictable as Johnny's death because it was said that: He was tougher than the rest of us?tougher, colder, meaner. (page 19). I did not think that such a tough person would get himself killed because of a death of a friend, although it was said a short time before the death of Dally that: Johnny was the only thing Dally loved. (page 160). The climaxes at the end of the story were the deaths of Johnny and Dally. Here are quotations about the deaths: Johnny's death: The pillow seemed to sink a little, and Johnny died. (page 157). Dally's death: He was jerked half around by the impact of the bullets, then slowly crumpled with a look of grim triumph on his face. He was dead before he hit the ground. (page 162). To conclude I can say that the plot development was simple and easy to understand and to follow. The author organized it in a way that fits the actual content of the plot. Character Development The characters in the book, The Outsiders by S.E. Hinton, were not very heroic?they were just humans?it was easy to believe that this is the way they should be. The characters in the plot give the reader a feeling this can be a true story. The author has created the personality of the characters through the descriptions of Ponyboy?the narrator?and through their actions. Following are some examples of these methods of getting familiar with a character. Here is an example for a description of Ponyboy: Steve Randle was seventeen, tall and lean, with thick greasy hair he kept combed in complicated swirls. He was cocky, smart, and Soda's best buddy since grade school. Steve's specialty was cars... (page 17). The reader can find this kind of descriptions almost everywhere in the story, but especially in the beginning. I think the author put them there because the reader

Richard Nixon essays

Richard Nixon essays The Soviet Union was America's great adversary in this era, but since 1960 the USSR had not had good relations with China. Nixon thought that improved Sino-American ties would undermine the Soviets. He also hoped that China would pressure the North Vietnamese to end the war. A year before his election Nixon had written of the Chinese, "There is no place on this small planet for a billion of its potentially most able people to live in angry isolation." As president, Nixon began with small steps. First he exchanged sports teams: China sent over its world champion table tennis team, and "ping pong" diplomacy began. Then Kissinger in 1971 was sent on a secret mission to Beijing to prepare for a summit between U.S. and Chinese leaders. Thereafter Kissinger met more than twenty times with Chinese leaders to discuss world issues. Acting on behalf of Nixon, Kissinger and Chinese Foreign Minister Zhou Enlai made a deal: the U.S. would withdraw all its troops from Taiwan, end its opposition to seating China at the United Nations (which meant expelling Taiwan from the seat); and Nixon would be received in China for a summit. In October China was seated in the UN without American opposition. In February 1972 Nixon traveled to Beijing, and it was a media triumph for him. What was most compelling about it all was that it was Nixon, a man who had accused communists of wanting to take over the world, who opened the ancient nation's sealed portals. The two nations signed a declaration of principles known as the Shanghai Communique. The U.S. recognized the principle of only "one China." They also agreed to combat "hegemony"-meaning Soviet Russian influence-in Asia. Nixon established low-level diplomatic relations with China, sending George Bush to head up a new American mission. Full diplomatic recognition, however, was not exchanged. Nixon was able to parlay his dtente with China into a more constructive relation with the Soviet ...

Undecided Assignment Example | Topics and Well Written Essays - 250 words

Undecided - Assignment Example This is evident in their intention to cross the first bridge between Europe and Asia knowing well that a heavy storm had broken it down. Xerxes and the Persian Army dared to take risks beyond their reasonable thresholds. The decision-making processes were not based on intelligence, but rather on the hope that the Greek Armies were divided. Finally, the Persian Army consisted of traitors, which gave leading information to the Spartan Army (Herodotus 165). Even though the Greek army was separated into city-states, Herodotus explains that each city-state had a special link to another when it came to war (Herodotus 145). As the revelation comes of an impending attack, the Spartans quickly organize a united force to resist the enemy. Secondly, The Greek armies were operating on the timely information to make intelligent decisions. Thirdly, the Greek Army had well trained soldiers, all of whom had a voice based on the democracy and the religious set up of the city-states. Unlike the Persian Army, the Greeks were able to share news of an advancing enemy and ideas on how to resist. Finally, Herodotus reveals that the Greeks took an advantage of the Persian Traitors to defeat them (Herodotus